Inquiry recently published a paper by Max Deutsch responding to Avner Baz’s ordinary language critique of mainstream analytic philosophy. The journal then invited Baz to reply to Deutsch’s paper. Their full exchange (see links below) will be of interest to OLP&Lit readers eager to understand what’s at stake in between analytic and ordinary language philosophy.
The relevant citations are as follows:
- “Must Philosopher Rely on Intuitions?” (Journal of Philosophy, 2012)
- “Recent Attempts to Defend the Method of Cases, and the Linguistic (Re)turn” (forthcoming in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research): http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/phpr.12106/abstract
- Deutsch’s criticism of Baz’s argument (Inquiry, September 2015): “Avner Baz on the ‘Point’ of a Question”: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0020174X.2015.1083467
- Baz’s reply to Deutsch (Inquiry, November 2015): “Questioning the Method of Cases Fundamentally”: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0020174X.2015.1109178?journalCode=sinq20